source: liacs/pnbm/project/report.tex@ 51

Last change on this file since 51 was 25, checked in by Rick van der Zwet, 15 years ago

Almost final report

File size: 6.6 KB
RevLine 
[11]1%
2% $Id: report.tex 571 2008-04-20 17:31:04Z rick $
3%
4
5\documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article}
6
7\frenchspacing
[12]8\usepackage[english]{babel}
9\selectlanguage{english}
[11]10\usepackage{graphicx}
11\usepackage{url}
12\usepackage{multicol}
13\usepackage{fancybox}
14\usepackage{amssymb,amsmath}
15
[25]16\title{Modeling planar signalling in AP axis development in \emph{Xenopus laevis}\\
[11]17\large{using Petri Nets in Higher Level Developmental Biology}}
18\author{Rick van der Zwet, Tiago Borges Coelho \\
19 \texttt{<hvdzwet@liacs.nl>,<borges.coelho@gmail.com>}\\
20 LIACS - Leiden University, The Netherlands}
21\date{\today}
22
23\begin{document}
24\maketitle
25\section{Abstract}
[25]26Planar signaling is the process within the development of the AP axis
27development of the \emph{Xenopus laevis} \cite{Bertens09} in which cells
28accumulate proteins based on the saturation of nearby cells. If one cell
29produces n amount of proteins, it will initiate a transferring cascade to cells
30in the vicinity. This dissemination of proteins will eventually cease,
31considering that n is a finite variable. There is a gradation in the amount of
32proteins transferred, meaning that neighbouring cells get n/2 the amount of
33proteins of the most saturated cell.
[11]34
[25]35We are going to model this into Petri-Nets beeing a mathematical modeling
36language, which suit well for this purpose as we could nicely model the process
37in graphical interactive representation and could also be used for automated
38model tracking and analyze.
[11]39
[25]40\section{Approach}
41First a Petri-Net model will be defined textually and using graphs next the
42modeling will be taking into practice using the modeling tool\emph{CPNTools}
43\footnote{http://wiki.daimi.au.dk/cpntools/cpntools.wiki}.
[11]44
45\section{Modeling}
[25]46To model this process we will take a modular approach using coloured Petri-Nets
[12]47(see Fig~\ref{fig:model}), since the goal of this assignment is to have a
48solution that can be applied to any configuration of cells. We start with a
[25]49building block that is an abstraction of a cell (figure: circle), which can then
[12]50be coupled to other cells (figure: arrows). The abstraction contains two
51different types. First the proteins are modelled (figure: red), secondly the
52proteins (figure: blue) are leading in a second process of the creation of
[25]53posterisation which also needs modeling. We assume a 1:1 mapping between the amount
54of proteins and the posterisation -this taken into consideration- ones an
55\texttt{INITIAL} protein is 'used' (e.g. has on posterisation counterpart) in
56this process it
[18]57get called \texttt{ACTIVATED}. We assume that the proteins to posterisation
58process is taking place at the same time as the proteins distribution. And in a
59special format (figure: object B). It tries to matches the posterisation to the
60same level as the proteins present. But the moment the protein level lowers,
61the posterisation will remain the same. In pseudo-code:
62\begin{verbatim}
63if numPos < numProteins then
64 numPos = numPos + 1
65endif
66\end{verbatim}
67\texttt{numProteins} is the proteins available and \texttt{numPos} is the
68posterisation present.
[11]69
[25]70The connectors between the cells (the membranes) has a special properly. One
71can see them as pressure valves others as siphons (see Fig~\ref{fig:pressure}).
[11]72The moment the 'volume' at complies with the following properly $A / 2 < B$
[18]73then the pressure closes, else it passes volume from A to B at an certain rate
74(\texttt{flowSpeed}). This rate could depend on the difference, actual value present
[25]75or something else. Please do mind that negative values could ever appear hence
76the checking whether the source is bigger or equal then the flowSpeed.
[18]77
[25]78For the case there exists no standard Petri-Net 'component', hence this require
[12]79the creation of a new property (figure: $2:1$), with the following properties:
[11]80
[12]81\begin{verbatim}
[18]82flowSpeed = n
[25]83if A > 2 * B and A => flowSpeed then
[12]84 A = A - flowSpeed
85 B = B + flowSpeed
[25]86else if B > 2 * A and B => flowSpeed then
[12]87 B = B - flowSpeed
88 A = A + flowSpeed
89endif
90\end{verbatim}
91
[11]92Planar signaling could theoretically start in every cell, by
[25]93inserting some amount of proteins. In our model represented as a bunch of
94\texttt{INITIAL} tokens being put in a random cell.
[11]95
[12]96\begin{figure}[htp]
97\centering
98\caption{Planar signaling model}
[18]99\includegraphics[width=100mm]{planar-signaling-model.eps}
[12]100\label{fig:model}
101\end{figure}
[11]102
103\begin{figure}[htp]
104\centering
105\caption{Pressure valve example}
106\includegraphics[height=60mm]{pressure-valve.eps}
107\label{fig:pressure}
108\end{figure}
109
110\section{CPNTools 'implementation'}
111CPNTools has quite some shortcomings when it comes to modeling (higher level
[12]112developmental) biology.
[11]113
[12]114One it the shortcoming of the 'balancing'. It does not allow reading of how
[25]115many tokens are present in a certain state and base action upon them. As
[12]116workaround for this (see Fig~\ref{fig:CPNplanar}) we used a 'dump' gradation
117function. In our case it simply take 3 tokens and pushes 1 forward and
[18]118converting 2 directly to \texttt{ACTIVATED}. This does not take in
119consideration if the amount get changed in 'further-up', by some external
120source.
[12]121
[11]122Secondly it is missing a possibility to for easy random initialisation for
123modeling purposes. As a dirty quirk we 'hacked' it to choose between starting
124at the head or the tail.
125
[25]126In this implementation the proteins to gradients process is taking place at
127cell $A$ at the same time that the proteins get transferred from cell $A$ to
[12]128$B$.
[11]129
[12]130Also it should be noted that it missing a notion of timed firing sequences;
131meaning firing sequences which will occur at an certain time. This could for
[25]132example used to 'trigger' a timed activation of the \texttt{INITIAL} to
[18]133\texttt{ACTIVATED} process as modeled in fig~\ref{fig:model}. An initial idea
[25]134is shown at fig~\ref{fig:time-idea} in appendix~\ref{sec:timer-idea}.
[12]135
[18]136
[11]137\begin{figure}[htp]
138\centering
139\caption{CPNTools implementation}
140\advance\leftskip-2cm
141\advance\rightskip+2cm
142\includegraphics[width=1.3\textwidth]{planer-signaling.eps}
143\label{fig:CPNplanar}
144\end{figure}
145
146\section{Conclusion}
[25]147Using Petri-Nets for modeling biology processes is a powerful framework, which
148could be well expandable. The Proof Of Concept implementations and
[11]149visualisations how-ever are lacking. \emph{CPNTools} for example does not
[25]150provide a powerful enough tool-set for the modeling purposes.
[11]151
[25]152\bibliographystyle{amsalpha}
[11]153\begin{thebibliography}{10}
[25]154\bibitem[Bertens09]{Bertens09}Laura M.F. Bertens et al., Using Petri Nets in Higher
155Level Developmental Biology: A case study on the AP axis development in Xenopus
156laevis Extended Abstract, 2009
[11]157\end{thebibliography}
[25]158\appendix
159\section{Timer Idea}
160\label{sec:timer-idea}
[18]161
162\begin{figure}[htp]
163\centering
164\caption{Timed transition idea}
165\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{timer-proposal.eps}
166\label{fig:time-idea}
167\end{figure}
[11]168\end{document}
Note: See TracBrowser for help on using the repository browser.