1 | %
|
---|
2 | % $Id: report.tex 571 2008-04-20 17:31:04Z rick $
|
---|
3 | %
|
---|
4 |
|
---|
5 | \documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article}
|
---|
6 |
|
---|
7 | \frenchspacing
|
---|
8 | \usepackage[english]{babel}
|
---|
9 | \selectlanguage{english}
|
---|
10 | \usepackage{graphicx}
|
---|
11 | \usepackage{url}
|
---|
12 | \usepackage{multicol}
|
---|
13 | \usepackage{fancybox}
|
---|
14 | \usepackage{amssymb,amsmath}
|
---|
15 |
|
---|
16 | \title{DRAFT: Modeling planar signalling in AP axis development in \emph{Xenopus laevis}\\
|
---|
17 | \large{using Petri Nets in Higher Level Developmental Biology}}
|
---|
18 | \author{Rick van der Zwet, Tiago Borges Coelho \\
|
---|
19 | \texttt{<hvdzwet@liacs.nl>,<borges.coelho@gmail.com>}\\
|
---|
20 | LIACS - Leiden University, The Netherlands}
|
---|
21 | \date{\today}
|
---|
22 |
|
---|
23 | \begin{document}
|
---|
24 | \maketitle
|
---|
25 | \section{Abstract}
|
---|
26 | Planar signaling is the process in which cells accumulate proteins based on the
|
---|
27 | saturation of nearby cells. If one cell produces n ammount of proteins, it will
|
---|
28 | initiate a transfering cascade to cells in the vicinity. This dissemination of
|
---|
29 | proteins will eventually cease, considering that n is a finite variable. There
|
---|
30 | is a gradation in the ammount of proteins transfered, meaning that neighbouring
|
---|
31 | cells get n/2 the ammount of proteins of the most saturated cell.
|
---|
32 |
|
---|
33 | XXX: Citing to the Bio Papers
|
---|
34 | XXX: Small introductions Petri-nets
|
---|
35 |
|
---|
36 | \section{Approch}
|
---|
37 | First a PetriNet model will be defined textually and using graphs next the
|
---|
38 | modeling will be taking into practice using the modeling tool\emph{CPNTools}.
|
---|
39 |
|
---|
40 | \section{Modeling}
|
---|
41 | To model this process we will take a modular approach using coloured PetriNets
|
---|
42 | (see Fig~\ref{fig:model}), since the goal of this assignment is to have a
|
---|
43 | solution that can be applied to any configuration of cells. We start with a
|
---|
44 | bulding block that is an abstraction of a cell (figure: circle), which can then
|
---|
45 | be coupled to other cells (figure: arrows). The abstraction contains two
|
---|
46 | different types. First the proteins are modelled (figure: red), secondly the
|
---|
47 | proteins (figure: blue) are leading in a second process of the creation of
|
---|
48 | gradients which also needs modeling. We assume a 1:1 mapping between the amount
|
---|
49 | of proteins and gradients -this taken into consideration- ones an \texttt{INITIAL}
|
---|
50 | protein is 'used' (e.g. has on posterisation counterpart) in this process it
|
---|
51 | get called \texttt{ACTIVATED}. We assume that the proteins to posterisation
|
---|
52 | process is taking place at the same time as the proteins distribution. And in a
|
---|
53 | special format (figure: object B). It tries to matches the posterisation to the
|
---|
54 | same level as the proteins present. But the moment the protein level lowers,
|
---|
55 | the posterisation will remain the same. In pseudo-code:
|
---|
56 | \begin{verbatim}
|
---|
57 | if numPos < numProteins then
|
---|
58 | numPos = numPos + 1
|
---|
59 | endif
|
---|
60 | \end{verbatim}
|
---|
61 | \texttt{numProteins} is the proteins available and \texttt{numPos} is the
|
---|
62 | posterisation present.
|
---|
63 |
|
---|
64 | The connectors between the cells (the membrams) has a special properly. One
|
---|
65 | can see them as pressure valves others as sighons (see Fig~\ref{fig:pressure}).
|
---|
66 | The moment the 'volume' at complies with the following properly $A / 2 < B$
|
---|
67 | then the pressure closes, else it passes volume from A to B at an certain rate
|
---|
68 | (\texttt{flowSpeed}). This rate could depend on the difference, actual value present
|
---|
69 | or something else.
|
---|
70 |
|
---|
71 | For the case there exists no standard PetriNet 'component', hence this require
|
---|
72 | the creation of a new property (figure: $2:1$), with the following properties:
|
---|
73 |
|
---|
74 | \begin{verbatim}
|
---|
75 | flowSpeed = n
|
---|
76 | if A > 2 * B then
|
---|
77 | A = A - flowSpeed
|
---|
78 | B = B + flowSpeed
|
---|
79 | else if B > 2 * A then
|
---|
80 | B = B - flowSpeed
|
---|
81 | A = A + flowSpeed
|
---|
82 | endif
|
---|
83 | \end{verbatim}
|
---|
84 |
|
---|
85 | Planar signaling could theoretically start in every cell, by
|
---|
86 | inserting some amount of protiens. In our model represented as a bunch of
|
---|
87 | \texttt{INITIAL} tokens beeing put in a random cell.
|
---|
88 |
|
---|
89 | \begin{figure}[htp]
|
---|
90 | \centering
|
---|
91 | \caption{Planar signaling model}
|
---|
92 | \includegraphics[width=100mm]{planar-signaling-model.eps}
|
---|
93 | \label{fig:model}
|
---|
94 | \end{figure}
|
---|
95 |
|
---|
96 | \begin{figure}[htp]
|
---|
97 | \centering
|
---|
98 | \caption{Pressure valve example}
|
---|
99 | \includegraphics[height=60mm]{pressure-valve.eps}
|
---|
100 | \label{fig:pressure}
|
---|
101 | \end{figure}
|
---|
102 |
|
---|
103 | \section{CPNTools 'implementation'}
|
---|
104 | CPNTools has quite some shortcomings when it comes to modeling (higher level
|
---|
105 | developmental) biology.
|
---|
106 |
|
---|
107 | One it the shortcoming of the 'balancing'. It does not allow reading of how
|
---|
108 | many tokens are present in a certain state and base action uppon them. As
|
---|
109 | workaround for this (see Fig~\ref{fig:CPNplanar}) we used a 'dump' gradation
|
---|
110 | function. In our case it simply take 3 tokens and pushes 1 forward and
|
---|
111 | converting 2 directly to \texttt{ACTIVATED}. This does not take in
|
---|
112 | consideration if the amount get changed in 'further-up', by some external
|
---|
113 | source.
|
---|
114 |
|
---|
115 | Secondly it is missing a possibility to for easy random initialisation for
|
---|
116 | modeling purposes. As a dirty quirk we 'hacked' it to choose between starting
|
---|
117 | at the head or the tail.
|
---|
118 |
|
---|
119 | In this implementation the protiens to gradiants process is taking place at
|
---|
120 | cell $A$ at the same time that the proteins get transfered from cell $A$ to
|
---|
121 | $B$.
|
---|
122 |
|
---|
123 | Also it should be noted that it missing a notion of timed firing sequences;
|
---|
124 | meaning firing sequences which will occur at an certain time. This could for
|
---|
125 | example used to 'trigger' a timmed activation of the \texttt{INITIAL} to
|
---|
126 | \texttt{ACTIVATED} process as modeled in fig~\ref{fig:model}. An initial idea
|
---|
127 | is shown at fig\ref{fig:time-idea} in appendix 1.
|
---|
128 |
|
---|
129 |
|
---|
130 | \begin{figure}[htp]
|
---|
131 | \centering
|
---|
132 | \caption{CPNTools implementation}
|
---|
133 | \advance\leftskip-2cm
|
---|
134 | \advance\rightskip+2cm
|
---|
135 | \includegraphics[width=1.3\textwidth]{planer-signaling.eps}
|
---|
136 | \label{fig:CPNplanar}
|
---|
137 | \end{figure}
|
---|
138 |
|
---|
139 | \section{Conclusion}
|
---|
140 | Using PetriNets for modeling biology processes is a powerful framework, which
|
---|
141 | could be well extendable. The Proof Of Concept implementations and
|
---|
142 | visualisations how-ever are lacking. \emph{CPNTools} for example does not
|
---|
143 | provide a powerfull enough toolset for the modeling purposes.
|
---|
144 |
|
---|
145 | \begin{thebibliography}{10}
|
---|
146 | % sing Petri Nets in Higher Level Developmental Biology:
|
---|
147 | % A case study on the AP axis development in Xenopus laevis
|
---|
148 | % Extended Abstract
|
---|
149 | % http://www.liacs.nl/~csbpn/COURSE%20DOCUMENTS/extended%20abstract%20Bertens%20Jansen%20Kleijn%20Koutny%20Verbeek.pdf
|
---|
150 | % Laura M.F. Bertens
|
---|
151 |
|
---|
152 | % http://www.liacs.nl/~csbpn/
|
---|
153 | %
|
---|
154 | %
|
---|
155 |
|
---|
156 | \end{thebibliography}
|
---|
157 | \section{*Appendix}
|
---|
158 |
|
---|
159 | \begin{figure}[htp]
|
---|
160 | \centering
|
---|
161 | \caption{Timed transition idea}
|
---|
162 | \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{timer-proposal.eps}
|
---|
163 | \label{fig:time-idea}
|
---|
164 | \end{figure}
|
---|
165 | \end{document}
|
---|