- Timestamp:
- Dec 1, 2009, 11:07:43 AM (15 years ago)
- Location:
- liacs/pnbm/project
- Files:
-
- 1 edited
- 2 moved
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
liacs/pnbm/project/report.tex
r11 r12 6 6 7 7 \frenchspacing 8 \usepackage[english ,dutch]{babel}9 \selectlanguage{ dutch}8 \usepackage[english]{babel} 9 \selectlanguage{english} 10 10 \usepackage{graphicx} 11 11 \usepackage{url} … … 39 39 40 40 \section{Modeling} 41 To model this process we will take a modular approach, since the goal of this 42 assignment is to have a solution that can be applied to any configuration of 43 cells. We start with a bulding block that is an abstraction of a cell, 44 which can then be coupled to other cells. The abstraction contains two 45 different types. First the proteins are modelled, secondly the proteins are leading 46 in a second process of the creation of gradients which also needs modeling. We 47 assume a 1:1 mapping between the amount of proteins and gradients -this taken 48 into consideration- ones an $INITIAL$ protein is used in this process it get 49 called $ACTIVATED$. We assume that this process is taking place at cell $A$ at 50 the same time that the proteins get transfered from cell $A$ to $B$. 41 To model this process we will take a modular approach using coloured PetriNets 42 (see Fig~\ref{fig:model}), since the goal of this assignment is to have a 43 solution that can be applied to any configuration of cells. We start with a 44 bulding block that is an abstraction of a cell (figure: circle), which can then 45 be coupled to other cells (figure: arrows). The abstraction contains two 46 different types. First the proteins are modelled (figure: red), secondly the 47 proteins (figure: blue) are leading in a second process of the creation of 48 gradients which also needs modeling. We assume a 1:1 mapping between the amount 49 of proteins and gradients -this taken into consideration- ones an $INITIAL$ 50 protein is used in this process it get called $ACTIVATED$. We assume that the 51 proteins to gradients process is starting at an certain time from the start of 52 the process. 51 53 52 54 The connectors between the cells (the membrams) has a special properly. One … … 55 57 then the pressure closes, else it passes volume from A to B at an certain rate. 56 58 For the case there exists no standard PetriNet 'component', hence this require 57 the creation of a new property. 59 the creation of a new property (figure: $2:1$), with the following properties: 60 61 \begin{verbatim} 62 flowSpeed = 2 63 if A > 2 * B then 64 A = A - flowSpeed 65 B = B + flowSpeed 66 else if B > 2 * A then 67 B = B - flowSpeed 68 A = A + flowSpeed 69 endif 70 \end{verbatim} 58 71 59 72 Planar signaling could theoretically start in every cell, by … … 61 74 $INITIAL$ tokens beeing put in a random cell. 62 75 76 \begin{figure}[htp] 77 \centering 78 \caption{Planar signaling model} 79 \includegraphics[width=60mm]{planar-signaling-model.eps} 80 \label{fig:model} 81 \end{figure} 63 82 64 83 \begin{figure}[htp] … … 71 90 \section{CPNTools 'implementation'} 72 91 CPNTools has quite some shortcomings when it comes to modeling (higher level 73 developmental) biology. One it the shortcoming of the 'balancing'. It does not 74 allow reading of how many tokens are present in a certain state and base action 75 uppon them. As workaround for this (see Fig~\ref{fig:CPNplanar}) we used a 76 'dump' gradation function. In our case it simply take 3 tokens and pushes 1 77 forward and converting 2 directly to $ACTIVATED$. This does not take in 78 consideration if the amount get changed in 'further-up', by some external source. 92 developmental) biology. 93 94 One it the shortcoming of the 'balancing'. It does not allow reading of how 95 many tokens are present in a certain state and base action uppon them. As 96 workaround for this (see Fig~\ref{fig:CPNplanar}) we used a 'dump' gradation 97 function. In our case it simply take 3 tokens and pushes 1 forward and 98 converting 2 directly to $ACTIVATED$. This does not take in consideration if 99 the amount get changed in 'further-up', by some external source. 79 100 80 101 Secondly it is missing a possibility to for easy random initialisation for … … 82 103 at the head or the tail. 83 104 84 Not very important for our case, but also it should be noted that it missing a 85 notion of timed firing sequences; meaning firing sequences which will occur at 86 an certain time. This could for example used to 'trigger' a timmed activation 87 of the $INITIAL$ to $ACTIVATED$ process. 105 In this implementation the protiens to gradiants process is taking place at 106 cell $A$ at the same time that the proteins get transfered from cell $A$ to 107 $B$. 108 109 Also it should be noted that it missing a notion of timed firing sequences; 110 meaning firing sequences which will occur at an certain time. This could for 111 example used to 'trigger' a timmed activation of the $INITIAL$ to $ACTIVATED$ 112 process as modeled in fig~\ref{fig:model}. 88 113 89 114 \begin{figure}[htp]
Note:
See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.